hacker goals learn skills/concepts educate about and demonstrate new solutions and weaknesses in current solutions How hacker "groups" accomplish these goals conferences/meetings (CCC/2600/PLA/CDC) collective workspaces (Half bakery/walnut factory) Houses/squats (HHH/puscii) Short description of 2600 Public space No dues No speaker Present projects Conference funded by magazine and entrance fee vs. CCC Private space dues speaker perform projects funded by regional group Conference funded by dues and entrance fee Why this talk More efficient teaching techniques for accomplishing ad-hoc management, keeping creative people focused traditional companies/corporations vs. open source groups/enthusiast clubs people come to meetings wanting to teach or learn Transmission learning vs. collective learning Discovery in dialogue, potential always for new ideas, exploration of old ideas organized groups (corporate/schools) ad hoc groups (CTF/open source developers/enthusiasts) I)highly organized group A) Description 1) Hierarchy 2) Reporting 3) Decision making B) Problems 1) bristle at uneducated criticism 2) offer solutions without the opportunity to impliment 3) without the opportunity to apply ideas, slow stagnation II)T A) Description 1) Teams of peers 2) Same field 3) Roles B) Problems 1) if the other team members dont understand an idea, it wont be clear how pursuing it would be beneficial 2) Only people experienced in a subject can make rational decisions concerning courses of action in that subject 3) Concensus on goals 4) teams reports as one entity to management III)The resultant experience A) Description 1) Teams and individuals grouped within the hierarchy from one strata 2) Decisions come from above 3) Reports rise B) Problems 1) No new ideas due to matched skills, but matched skills cause needless disagreement to prove ability 2) Only the least significant decisions are made by those best suited to make them 3) Perceived lack of performance within social structures-despite individual performance-will result in social friction and potential managerial reprimand transmission learning (lectures/classrooms) 1 teacher, multiple students the teacher is the only person required to understand the topic the students only need knowledge of the language and lingo related to the topic collective learning (projects/workshops) the more people educated in the topic the better the system works potential for discussion, new discovery IV)Parallel problem solving (challenge) A) Description 1) Break strata and share solutions from small groups 2) Make task achievable - achievable tasks affect participants and empower individuals in a controllable way 3) Diverse task - Integrate organizational goals to create a complex goal requiring multiple skills B) Problems 1) Heavy resource cost 2) Perceived as distracting from core business V)Constructive learning (educate) A) Description 1) History 2) OM, Model UN 3) Comparison to transmission learning 4) Multiple levels - cross training B) Problems 1) Heavy resource cost 2) Distracting (challenges ideally do not relate to business objectives directly so as to diversify knowledge-engineers already know engineering) Organizations of individuals(Similarly interested individuals who form an organization with goals similar to its members) I)Emergent Management II)Need for acceptance III)the resultant experience IV)Leadership V) Social friction Deadlines kill the reforms Lack of funding limits project to management, not involving the more populous, expert strata